Thus, GNOME Foundation Executive Director Neil McGovern taught our lawful insight at Shearman and Sterling to document three papers with the court in California.
Initial: a movement to reject the case altogether. We don't accept this is a legitimate patent, or that product can or ought to have the option to be licensed thusly. We need to ensure that this patent isn't utilized against any other person, ever.
Second: our response to the case. We don't accept that there is a case GNOME needs to reply to. We need to show that the utilization of Shotwell, and free programming by and large, isn't influenced by this patent.
Third: our counterclaim. We need to ensure this isn't simply dropped when Rothschild acknowledges we're going to battle this.
We need to make an impression on all product patent trolls out there — we will battle your suit, we will win, and we will have your patent discredited. To do this, we need your assistance. It would be ideal if you help bolster the GNOME Foundation in communicating something specific that patent trolls ought to never target free programming by making a gift to the GNOME Patent Troll Defense Fund. In the event that you can't, it would be ideal if you help spread the news with your companions via web-based networking media.